The relationship between reversibility and hyperreactivity.

l. Juniper EF, Frith PA, Dunneu C, Cockcroft DW, Hargreavc FE. Reproducibility and comparison of responses to inhaled histamine and methacholine. Thorax, 1978,33,705-710. 2. O'Byme PM, Ryan G, Morris M, McConnack D, Joncs NL, Morse JLC, Hargreave FE. Asthma induced by cold air and its relation to nonspecific bronchial responsiveness to methacholine. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1982, 125, 281-285. 3. Ryan G, Dolovich MB, Obminski G, Cockcroft DW, Juniper EF, Hargrcave FE, New house MT. Standardization of inhalation provocation tests; influence of nebulizer output, particle size and method of inhalation. J Allergy C/in lmmu!WI, 181, 67, 156-161. 4. Eiser NM, Kerrebijn KF, Quanjer PH. -Guidelines for standardization of bronchial challenge with (nonspecific) bronchoconstricting agents. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir, 1983, 19, 495-514. 5. CockcrofL DW, Killian ON, Mc11on llA, Hargreave FE. Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine; a method and clinical survey. Clin Allergy, 1917, 7, 237-243. 6. Chai H, Farr RS, Froehlich LA, Matheson DA, McLean JA, Roscnthal RR, Sheffer AL. Spector SL, Townley RG.Standardization of bronchial inhalation procedures. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 1975,56,323-327. 7. Beaupre A, Malo JL. Comparison of histamine bronchial challenge with the Wright's nebulizer and the dosimeter. Clin Allergy, 1979, 19, 575583. 8. Ryan G, Do1ovich MB, Roberts RS. Frith PA, Juniper EF, Hargreavc FE, Newhouse MT. Standardization of inhalation provoca[iOn tests; two techniques of aerosol generation and inhalation compared. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1981, 123, 195-199. 9. Brinon J, Mortagy A, Tallersfield A. Histamine challenge testing: comparison of three methods. Thorax, 1986.41, 128I 32. I 0. Carticr A, Malo JL, Begin P. Sestier M, Martin RR.-Time course of the bronchoconstrictioo induced byinhaled histamine and methacholine. J Appl Physiol: Respiral Environ Exerci.te Physio/, 1983, 54, 821-826.